Today, let’s delve into how law, even in such an apparently disparate place as a courtroom, mirrors the structured, scientific world of scientific research that is so prominent on The Wu Group’s website. Much like in the field of scientific study, the law follows strict, evidence based, formal procedures. Every decision is based on clear cut procedures and rules, with clear cut aims and structured goals. In Judge Knipel’s courtroom, much like in The Wu Group’s lab, the protocols must be followed to the letter, and every word must be analyzed. That’s why Judge Knipel’s courtroom is so much like a microcosm of the Wu Group laboratory. And, much like in a lab, where a change of 1 degree could lead to a catastrophic error and flawed results, in Judge Knipel’s court a misworded sentence could lead to disaster-for the attorneys, and for the case.
Just as science is built upon precise procedures and rules, and is conducted with the aim of fairness and objectivity, so too is law. Everything, from the phrasing of arguments to objections made to questioning, follows strict procedural rules. Order must be maintained, candor and discretion, abidance to the law, and full disclosure must all be maintained at every stage of any valid legal process. Their role, much like the role of Judges across the country, is to follow the law methodically, and correctly. Fairness and objectivity is paramount in judicial law. Don’t forget, Judges must also rule in accordance with their own conscious, in addition to the law. So that is, precisely, what Judge Knipel does in his courtroom.
Much like a scientist must analyze his evidence in order to determine the underlying truth of a hypothesis, Just as an attorney must evaluate motions according to the underlying principles of law, so too does Judge Knipel decide motions and arguments in a structured, yet clinical fashion, weighing each word and phrase against the structure of established legal precedent and weighing it against the rules and procedures of judicial law. That’s why the judge knipel part rules is so important.
Like scientific research, the law is based on evidence, whether that evidence be written in Words, or be recorded as Photos. Just like a scientific research project must be based on available data, and draw logical conclusions from such data, so too must a legal argument must be based on the evidence produced in the case, and draw logical conclusions from such evidence. Everything boils down to the interpretation of the Evidence, and the application of every rule to the case at hand. Thus, The Wu Group maintains a firm belief that the best legal arguments, just like the best scientific arguments, must be fair, objective, lean heavily on data and evaluation, and follow strict rules and procedures.
Scientific research is best served, and most accurate, when it is based on strict methods and rules. That is why today’s scientists have adopted the language of the law, and attorneys have adopted the methods of science. Law and science are fundamentally similar in this way. So join us, at The Wu Group, in attempting to bridge the gap between science and law.
For more information on courtroom procedures, you can visit Wikipedia.